I stumbled via twitter across a blog a woman wrote about wedding photographers and their seemingly outrageous price packages, and after reading through (at the time) the 115 comments, I had to comment. I am not someone who typically comments on any blog. Though I read a good number of a wide variety of them, commenting isn’t something I do. While I will keep my opinions to myself here about her opinion on the subject, because it’s not why I am writing this, the comments from my fellow photographers upset me more than her post did.
I am wondering more about when photography became such an equipment driven field. When did it become about who has the best camera, the best lens, the best bag. Who started this trend? Did it start when the megapixel war began? We’ve all come to realize (or at least those of you who cared to begin with are beginning to realize) that megapixels don’t matter as much as you thought. So, to continue on, who started the equipment war. I’m not really asking. I’m just stating.
This is the relevant part of what I said, and I am fully expecting a backlash for this, but it’s ok. I can back myself up:
One point I want to bring to light that is really, really bothering me in reading over all the comments here from the other photographers who have commented is the many, many remarks about equipment, and I will probably get a lot of off screen backlash for it, but they continually mention a “pro has this much money worth of gear and this expensive brand of camera and a canon MK II this and Nikon d that and blah blah blah” and I’m sorry to all you other photographers out there who think it’s the equipment that make you the photographer you are, and the photoshopping you have to do after that makes your images pop out of the world and stand out but it is not. If your images need that much work out of camera, then you are kidding yourselves. You should NOT be spending hours upon hours in post-processing. And whoever it was that said post-processing was non-existent in darkroom days, go back to photography school and retake the film class. It is not the camera that makes the photographer, it the person that makes the photograph. The camera is just a tool, just as a paintbrush is a tool for the painter, and a pencil is for the person who draws and a voice for the singer. It is no difference. Photographers are artists, regardless of what their chosen field of photography is.
I’ve read many a story about the world’s most top renowned fashion photographer using a point and shoot. He obviously doesn’t care to lug around the most newly released DSLR Canon or Nikon has given him to test for next weeks release with a hefty price tag of $14,000, with the lens that matches the price tag. So why should you wedding photographers, or landscape photographers care, because we all know he’s more famous than you ever will be, and admit it, his shooting matter is way more beautiful too, and he needs the best gear he can get. So why doesn’t he use it if you have to?
Obviously he works in a far more controlled situation than a wedding is, and his needs are very different. But I am not a dumb woman either. I know how to kneel, how to squat, I also know how to run in to get close to my subject, so I don’t really need a huge telephoto lens. I also know how to back far away fast too to get that wide angle, so there goes that lens. Do you really need 5 of them? Do you really NEED everything you insist you do? Have you tried to push yourselves to go without all that you use as a crutch, have you tried to step outside of your gear comfort zones and limit yourselves with? I’m not suggesting shooting a wedding with a point and shoot, but how much of what you use or have is a necessity.
How often do you just go through the motions, switching this with that and just click click click. Slide this here and slide that there. Pop the lens this way or that depending on the light. How much do you actually think when you are doing what you do? Honestly. Be honest with yourselves. I think the comments on the original post here speak more loudly about what this field has become than anything else could ever say about it. It has become less an artform and more of an industry and it shouldn’t be. When the focus becomes about business, and not the art, you have lost your focus, your passion, and your work reflects that, and that is when you end up in someone’s trash bin, and not their binder.
This photograph was taken in August of 2005 in Pass Christian, Mississippi. It was shot with a Canon Powershot 3.2 mp point and shoot, in a moving vehicle doing 50mph. There was very minimal post processing. In other words, I upped the contrast, because that’s the ONLY processing I do on my photographs. I am not the person to argue how equipment matters. I have many, many more photographs taken with what many professional photographers would call “crap gear” that are on par with this photograph and above. I have sold prints, I have been hired. I have made some money doing this. (Never much mind you, but I have never really tried either.) My clients and customers know exactly how big their prints can go. They never need or want bigger than an 11×14, they are happy with that. My last camera could go bigger, but there was never a need for it. But it was still a camera you would have considered crap. It’s not the camera that makes the photographer, it’s the person holding it.


